On this page
- What Was Louisiana’s Old Comparative Fault Rule?
- What Is Louisiana’s New 51% Rule?
- Example of Louisiana Comparative Fault
- Why Does This Matter After a Car Accident?
- Why Does It Matter Even More in an 18-Wheeler Case?
- What Evidence Can Establish Fault?
- What If Both Drivers Blame Each Other?
- What If Several People Caused the Accident?
- Does the New Rule Apply to Every Old Accident?
- What Should I Do After an Accident?
- Don’t Let an Insurance Adjuster Assign the Final Percentage of Fault
- Louisiana’s New Rule Makes Early Investigation More Important
- Talk to Jacqueline Scott & Associates
Beginning January 1, 2026, Louisiana moved away from its former pure comparative-fault system and adopted a 51% comparative-fault bar.
That change can determine whether an accident victim receives compensation at all.
Under current Louisiana Civil Code Article 2323, if you are found 51% or more negligent, you cannot recover damages.
If you are found less than 51% negligent, you can potentially recover damages, but the amount is reduced according to your percentage of negligence.
For people injured in car accidents, 18-wheeler wrecks, motorcycle crashes, premises accidents, and other incidents, proving exactly how an accident happened has become even more important.
At Jacqueline Scott & Associates, we investigate Louisiana accident claims with one central goal:
Follow the evidence and determine who was responsible.
What Was Louisiana’s Old Comparative Fault Rule?
Louisiana previously followed what is commonly called pure comparative fault.
Under that system, an injured person could potentially recover something even when assigned a very high percentage of responsibility.
The person’s damages were reduced according to that person’s percentage of fault.
That changed with Act No. 15 of the 2025 Regular Session.
The amendment became effective January 1, 2026.
What Is Louisiana’s New 51% Rule?
The new rule is straightforward but powerful.
If the injured person is:
0% at fault: no comparative-fault reduction.
10% at fault: damages may generally be reduced by 10%.
25% at fault: damages may generally be reduced by 25%.
50% at fault: damages may generally be reduced by 50%.
51% or more at fault: no recovery under the current rule.
That one percentage point between 50% and 51% can make an enormous difference.
Example of Louisiana Comparative Fault
Suppose a jury determines that an injured person’s damages total $500,000.
The jury finds the other driver 80% responsible and the injured driver 20% responsible.
Under the current rule, the injured person’s damages would generally be reduced according to the 20% negligence assigned to that person.
Now change the facts.
Suppose the injured person is found 51% responsible.
Under current Article 2323, that person cannot recover damages.
Why Does This Matter After a Car Accident?
Because fault is frequently disputed.
The other driver’s insurance company may argue that you:
- were speeding;
- stopped suddenly;
- failed to yield;
- made an unsafe lane change;
- were distracted;
- followed too closely; or
- could have avoided the collision.
Those allegations should be tested against actual evidence.
Why Does It Matter Even More in an 18-Wheeler Case?
A trucking company may have access to evidence that an ordinary motorist does not.
Potential evidence can include:
- dashcam footage;
- driver-facing cameras;
- GPS;
- telematics;
- electronic logging information;
- dispatch records;
- maintenance records;
- driver records; and
- other electronic information.
A trucking company may also begin investigating a serious collision quickly.
The injured person’s side needs to preserve independent evidence as well.
What Evidence Can Establish Fault?
Depending on the accident, useful evidence may include:
- police reports;
- photographs;
- videos;
- witnesses;
- surveillance footage;
- dashcams;
- vehicle damage;
- roadway evidence;
- electronic vehicle information;
- cellphone evidence when legally obtainable;
- trucking-company records; and
- expert accident reconstruction.
Not every case requires every type of evidence.
What If Both Drivers Blame Each Other?
That is precisely when objective evidence becomes important.
Consider an intersection accident.
Driver A says:
“I had the green light.”
Driver B says:
“No, I had the green light.”
The case should not stop there.
Potential evidence could include witnesses, surveillance footage, dashcams, traffic-system information when available, vehicle damage, roadway evidence, and other records.
What If Several People Caused the Accident?
Louisiana law requires fault to be considered among persons causing or contributing to the injury, death, or loss.
This can become particularly important in multi-vehicle collisions.
A serious interstate crash might involve:
- a truck driver;
- another passenger-vehicle driver;
- a motor carrier;
- another responsible business; and
- the injured driver.
Each person’s conduct may need to be evaluated.
Does the New Rule Apply to Every Old Accident?
No.
The effective date matters.
The amended Article 2323 took effect January 1, 2026.
Older accidents must be evaluated under the law applicable to the claim.
This is why an internet article about Louisiana law should never substitute for determining which version of the statute governs a particular accident.
What Should I Do After an Accident?
Protect the evidence early.
When safely possible:
- Call law enforcement.
- Photograph the scene.
- Photograph the vehicles.
- Identify witnesses.
- Save dashcam video.
- Obtain medical treatment.
- Preserve insurance correspondence.
- Keep your damaged vehicle when inspection may be necessary.
- Avoid guessing about facts you do not remember.
- Have disputed fault investigated.
Don’t Let an Insurance Adjuster Assign the Final Percentage of Fault
An insurer may tell you that its investigation concluded you were 40%, 50%, or 60% responsible.
That is the insurer’s position.
It is not automatically the final legal determination.
Evidence can be challenged.
Witnesses can be interviewed.
Video can contradict a driver’s statement.
Electronic information can provide additional context.
Louisiana’s New Rule Makes Early Investigation More Important
Under the current law, fault is not merely a question of reducing a settlement.
At 51%, it can determine whether recovery is barred.
That makes photographs, witnesses, video, electronic evidence, and accident reconstruction more important than ever in disputed-liability cases.
Talk to Jacqueline Scott & Associates
If an insurance company is blaming you for a Louisiana accident, do not assume its percentage is correct.
Let the evidence determine what happened.
Jacqueline Scott & Associates represents accident victims in Shreveport, Bossier City, Caddo Parish, Bossier Parish, and throughout Louisiana.
Call (318) 746-5997.
Make ’Em Pay.
Every case is different. Comparative fault depends on the facts, accident date, evidence, and applicable law. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This article provides general information and is not legal advice.
This article is general information about Louisiana law and is not legal advice. Laws and deadlines can change, and every case depends on its own facts. Past results do not guarantee or predict future outcomes. Reading this page or contacting the firm does not by itself create an attorney-client relationship.



